Email and domain risk summary
Grounded in the evidence, testing and risk context collected during this engagement.
Messaging security
Reduce spoofing, account takeover and business-email-compromise risk across the technical and human controls protecting trusted communication.
The business problem
Attackers exploit the trust attached to an organization’s domains and executives. Partial DMARC deployment, weak registrar security, inconsistent mailbox protection and untested payment workflows leave room for convincing impersonation.
Our audit examines the full trust chain: domain ownership, DNS records, email authentication, tenant controls, external exposure, reporting and employee response.
Audit coverage
Final scope reflects your environment, critical systems, risk profile and assurance objective.
Assessment process
Testing is evidence-led, risk-based and designed to protect business operations.
Engagement outputs
Grounded in the evidence, testing and risk context collected during this engagement.
Grounded in the evidence, testing and risk context collected during this engagement.
Grounded in the evidence, testing and risk context collected during this engagement.
Grounded in the evidence, testing and risk context collected during this engagement.
Grounded in the evidence, testing and risk context collected during this engagement.
Grounded in the evidence, testing and risk context collected during this engagement.
Standards and guidance
Applicable standards organize testing and reporting while the actual environment determines risk.
Frequently asked questions
We analyze authorized senders and reports first, then recommend a staged policy change designed to preserve legitimate delivery.
We combine DNS, DMARC aggregate data and stakeholder discovery to identify known and unexpected senders.
Yes, when authorized. Simulations are designed around agreed learning objectives, privacy limits and escalation procedures.
Yes. Tenant policies, mailbox protections, authentication and alerting can be included.
Yes. We assess likely impersonation patterns and recommend monitoring, defensive registration or takedown processes based on risk.
Related assessments
Discuss scope, timing, access requirements and the evidence your stakeholders need.